Archive Comparison

KGS Content Server4Storage

Architecture Description

  • KGS ContentServer4Storage presents itself to SAP as an HTTP server
  • No additional database layer for the administration of content  necessary
  • As a JAVA-application it can run on any operating system (Windows, Unix, Linux, etc.)
  • Minimal usage of resources

Configuration Advantages

  • Connection to storage system: talks to storage media using storage system drivers
  • Content administration: no additional database necessary
  • Connection to EMC2 Centera: no simulation of file system, no additional logic layer, since the Centera CLIP-IDs (unique addresses of the content objects in Centera) are stored directly in the SAP link tables

 

 Conventional Archive

Architecture Description:

  • The storage systems are connected through the archive system and its special modules
  • The archive system uses a data base to administer the content and document information
  • The archive system itself is not used directly by the user

Configuration Disadvantages

  • Performance: additional layer with servers, modules, data bases,....
  • Implementation cost: licenses for archive, database, implementation,....
  • Operational cost: software maintenance, operations personell, know how development,....

 

SAP Content Server

Architecture Description

  • The content server presents itself to SAP as an HTTP server
  • The engine has been developed as an MS IIS (Windows) engine or a module of the Apache web server (Unix)
  • The content server stores the data in the SAP data base or in the filesystem
  • The storage drivers hide the specific retrieval mechanisms of the storage media

Configuration Disadvantages

  • Connection to storage system: the content server can not talk to storage systems directly
  • Size restrictions: individual objects can have a maximum size of 2GB
  • Content administration: additional administration information in the KPro layer
  • SAP maintenance mode: SAP has stopped any further development